The Entire Essay did not make Sense
After a history instructor shared on social media his concerns that a student had used artificial intelligence (AI) to compose an essay, several UP faculty members demanded that the state institution reconsider academic integrity regulations to include the use — or abuse — of AI in establishing class requirements. The UP Diliman AI program faculty denounced the distortion of AI outputs as acceptable scholarly works in a statement issued on Wednesday, but also encouraged the use of technology to improve and stimulate student learning.
"Manuscripts, graphic designs, videos, computer programs, and other academic requirements must be created solely by the student or group of students as required by the course instructor," the organization stated. "However, the use of artificial intelligence tools to enhance and facilitate students' learning should be encouraged."
Earlier, Francisco Guiang, an assistant history professor, stated that one of his students might have utilized AI to compose an essay for his final test. The "entire essay did not make sense — it did not have cohesion, and just randomly dropped proper nouns that had nothing to do with the essay question," according to Guiang. He went on to state that he put sections of the student's essay through two independent AI detector websites, and "both yielded results indicating that the samples were most likely written by AI."
"This is academic dishonesty," Guiang stated. His remark generated a lengthy online discussion on the ethical use of AI to fulfill academic standards, as well as legitimate concerns that faculty members would "weaponize" AI detecting systems to allege academic dishonesty against original results.
According to the UP Diliman AI program faculty, there have been allegations of some student needs being generated using large language model (LLM) systems such as ChatGPT. They said that LLMs respond to inquiries by providing helpful sentences comprising thoughts and ideas based on information retrieved from the internet.
Teachers should be on the lookout for more than simply AI-generated writings, they stressed. According to the organization, AI may also be utilized for visual design (Stability AI and Midjourney), content production (Jasper AI), autonomous computer programs (CoPilot and Ghostwriter), voice impersonation (VALL-E), and synthetic human movies (Synthesia AI).
Simultaneously, they warned against a blanket ban on AI in university work, stressing how other top-ranked colleges in other countries were employing the technology to innovate and improve learning.
To improve this with SEO, we can add keywords such as "Academic integrity regulations," "Artificial intelligence," "UP Diliman AI program," and "AI-generated writings." We can also include meta tags such as "AI in education," "AI in universities," and "AI in academic requirements." Additionally, we can include internal and external links to relevant sources on the topic to provide more information for the readers.
SOURCE
What do you think of this blog? Write down at the COMMENT section below.
No comments:
Post a Comment